Thursday, November 21, 2024 - 12:55 pm CET
Email Email | Print Print | rss RSS | comments icon Comment |   font decrease font increase

   


Email Email | Print Print

post divider

Wed, March 30, 2011 | The Rubin Report | By Barry Rubin

Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil el-Arabi

 

Egypt Leaves the Anti-Iran Bloc

Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil el-Arabi said,

“The Egyptian government doesn’t consider Iran to be an enemy state. We’re opening a new page with all countries, including Iran.”

President Anwar al-Sadat cut relations with Iran in 1979, at the time of the Islamist revolution.

For three decades, Egypt’s government has seen Tehran as a threat and a rival on many levels:

— Persian versus Arab.

— Shia versus Sunni.

— A challenge to Egypt’s national interest and leading role in the region.

— A destabilizing factor, producing war, terrorism, and revolution in the region.

— In line with Egypt’s alliance with the United States — albeit for its own interests — Egypt opposed the spread of Iranian influence.

But now, as I pointed out at the beginning of the revolution, this has all changed. Obviously, Egypt’s government has the right to do what it wants in its relations with Iran. But equally obviously this is a big setback for U.S. interests in containing and combatting Iran’s power.

The next step will no doubt be Egypt’s rapprochement with the Hamas regime in the Gaza Strip.

All of this was completely predictable, but nobody in the U.S. government and very few in the media, saw it coming.


2 Comments to “Egypt Leaves the Anti-Iran Bloc”

  1. #Egypt Leaves the Anti-Iran Bloc | #Iran http://j.mp/dN3Q7y

  2. avatar Elisabeth says:

    RT @CrethiPlethi: #Egypt Leaves the Anti-Iran Bloc | #Iran http://j.mp/dN3Q7y


avatar

Quotes and Sayings

About the Region, Islam and cultural totalitarianism...

    The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.

    — Zuheir Mohsen, James Dorsey, “Wij zijn alleen Palestijn om politieke reden”, Trouw, 31 March 1977

Weather Forecast

Middle East region weather forecast...

CRETHIPLETHI.COM - ONLINE MAGAZINE COVERING the MIDDLE EAST, ISRAEL, the ARAB WORLD, SOUTHWEST ASIA and the ISLAMIC MAGHREB - since 2009