Email |  Print | RSS | Comment |  

 Email |  Print

Tue, Aug 30, 2011 | WikiLeaks document: 09OSLO90

Norway's Leftist-Islamic Alliance in action: Norway's Palestine Committee held a demonstration before parliament in support of the so-called "victims" in Gaza and now Minister of Education (at the time of this demonstration Minister of Finance) Kristin Halvorsen was a prominent activist during this demonstration in Oslo, Oct 01, 2009. The caption of the placard is “The greatest axis of evil -- USA and Israel." (Photo: Lise Åserud/SCANPIX)

WikiLeaks: Muslim minority anger in Norway rises

Yesterday, we published three WikiLeaks cables from the U.S. embassy in Oslo (February 2009) to show how Norway’s anti-Semitism and anti-Israel bias is deeply rooted within Norway’s society. This cable give us more background on Norway’s (Muslim) minorities, anti-semitism, anti-Israeli incitement and deeper integration issues.

Read the cable below:

(MUSLIM) MINORITY ANGER IN NORWAY RISES

Source: WikiLeaks

Reference ID: 09OSLO90
Created: 2009-02-03 06:02
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Origin: Embassy Oslo

VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNY #0090/01 0340602
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 030602Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7321
INFO RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 2497
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 8048
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 3357
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/FBI WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000090

SIPDIS

COPENHAGEN PASS TO LEGATT

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/30/2019
TAGS: PREL KIRF PTER ASEC KPAO KCRM KISL NO
SUBJECT: MINORITY ANGER IN NORWAY RISES

REF: A. 07 OSLO 1099
¶B. 08 OSLO 207
¶C. 08 OSLO 327

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Kevin M. Johnson
for reasons 1.4 b and d

¶1. (SBU) Summary: A series of anti-Israel demonstrations on
January 8 and January 10 erupted into violence in central
Oslo as some demonstrators, primarily young Muslim-background
youth, clashed with police. The damages, police action and
extent of the violence were the worst in Norway since the
1980s. After public outcry, Oslo city authorities, the
police, and some prominent members of Norway,s Muslim
community organized community sessions to discuss the
underlying causes motivating the violence. Despite this
seemingly happy ending, these events illustrate serious
underlying tensions in the minority population in Norway
which are only now beginning to come to the surface. End
Summary

The Riots
———-

¶2. (SBU) On January 8 at 1700 a group of 500 gathered outside
the Norwegian Parliament to mark their support of Israel.
This gathering attracted over 1,000 anti-Israel protestors
who turned violent. The violence included anti-Israel
protestors throwing stones, fireworks and debris at the
pro-Israel gathering and at Siv Jensen, the leader of the
Progress Party, Norway,s largest opposition party and a
supporter of Israel. The situation quickly became riotous
and resulted in millions of dollars worth of damage to retail
property along Oslo’s prime shopping street. Police used
tear gas, horses and dogs to finally disperse the crowds,
some seven hours after the demonstration began. Rioters
moving toward the U.S. Embassy were stopped by police about
one tenth of a mile from the Embassy. At least 31 rioters
were arrested, all of Muslim background. Some hours later an
anti-Israel demonstration numbering well over 10,000 gathered
peacefully and conducted a torch light parade.

¶3. (SBU) On January 10, another anti-Israel demonstration
resulted in violence including targeting of five McDonalds
restaurants in Oslo. A group of 3,000 demonstrators,
including children, met at Parliament to protest Israel,s
actions in Gaza in the early afternoon. The demonstration
moved to the Israeli Embassy and raucous protestors aimed
fireworks and rocks at police. Violence continued in
throughout the night downtown with various stores and
buildings targeted, including a Free Mason building hosting a
children,s holiday party. Five McDonald,s restaurants were
damaged, stemming from SMS messages saying that McDonalds was
donating all profits to Israel. The Police arrested 160
demonstrators of which 110 were of Muslim background. The
rest were known leftists including members of the Norwegian
anarchist group Blitz. One consequence of these actions was
the cancellation of a pro-Israel rally in Bergen because the
police said they could not protect it.

The Reactions
—————-

¶4. (SBU) Responses to the demonstrations sharply criticized
the violence of the demonstrators, condemned them for using
children in one march and focused on the fact that immigrant
Muslim youth caused the majority of the damage. This aspect
shocked many Norwegians who like to believe that integration
of immigrant populations is more advanced in Norway than
other European countries. In typical Norwegian fashion, a
Pakistani-Norwegian politician (and friend of the Embassy)
organized a public meeting between Oslo city authorities, the
police, the Islamic Council, Islamic Foundation, antiracist
centers, NGOs and Muslim background youth to discuss the
underlying causes motivating the violence. Consensus from
this meeting and from discussions with Embassy contacts in
Oslo,s minority population is that much of the violence
stemmed from general frustration and lack of outlets for
minority youth in Norwegian society, not necessarily from the
situation in Gaza, although that and the police reaction may
have contributed to the anger. GON officials were quick to
claim that this frustration did not stem from a failure in
Norway integration project, but from “hoodlums” who took
advantage of the demonstrations to run amok.

Comment
———–

¶5. (C) The general public and media in Norway is strongly
anti-Israel, as shown by the discrepancy in the numbers of
demonstrators in the anti-Israel demonstrations. Norway,s
minority Muslim populations certainly share this negative
view of Israel and the Norwegian public and media’s approach
legitimizes anti-Israeli sentiment. Genuine anger at Israel
certainly played a part in the feeling of the demonstrators.
However, the causes of the violence accompanying these
demonstrations appears to stem at least as much from
frustration about deeper integration issues, despite the
GON,s denial.

¶6. (C) Integration of minorities is a common theme in the
public debate, and there are numerous diligent NGOs working
with at-risk-youth and minority populations. In addition,
there are true success stories in Norway,s minority
populations, particularly in the well-established
Pakistani-Norwegian community. However, there remain real
difficulties for minority youth in achieving full
integration, access to good paying jobs and acceptance in
general society as full Norwegians. Wage and employment
statistics show that although immigrant populations are equal
or better paid in lower paying jobs, they receive
significantly lower wages than non-minority Norwegians if
occupying a traditionally higher paying position. The fact
that a Pakistani-Norwegian initiated the traditional
Norwegian dispute resolution dialogue process, and that this
was welcomed by Muslim youth, is a positive sign of the
willingness of Norway,s Muslim population to adopt Norwegian
norms. Now the GON and the general public need to
reciprocate.

¶7. (C) The Embassy has conducted extensive outreach into
Norway,s minority Muslim communities. We will continue to
report on the largest ethnic groups of Muslim background
minorities (see reftels), cultivate contacts in these groups,
reach out to schools, mosques and community organizations in
areas with high minority populations, encourage exchanges
with the U.S., and facilitate contacts between Norwegian
authorities and Muslim leaders. There is great enthusiasm in
Norway,s Muslim community about President Obama and we
intend to leverage this to dispel myths about the United
States, encourage members of Norway,s Muslim population to
visit and study in the U.S. and to strengthen the efforts of
those groups working on vital integration and
anti-radicalization programs. End Comment

WHITNEY